Facelift A Work Of Art & Security

Benjamin Franklin gets a facelift as the Treasury Department just unveiled a new $100 bill, the first remake of the denomination since 1996.




The $100 note is the highest value denomination of U.S. currency in general circulation and 2/3 circulate outside the USA. The denomination is popular when large amounts of cash need to be carried internationally.

Anti-counterfeiting measures are the main reason the United States has been making changes in currency. The currency changes started in 1996 with the $100 bill, followed by a new $20 bill in 2003. The $50 bill got an overhaul in 2004, and the $10 was redesigned in 2006. The $5 bill was upgraded in 2008.

The US government is redesigning the $100 bill to incorporate advances in currency security to make it more difficult to counterfeit and easier for the public to authenticate. The $100 is the highest denomination the US government issues and the most widely circulated outside the US. Although less than 1/100th of 1% of the value of US currency in circulation is reported counterfeit, the $100 note is the most often counterfeited denomination outside the US, according to the US Treasury department.

The new security features added to the $100 bill will help people spot bogus bills. The new security features include:

1. a 3-D security ribbon that runs vertically across the note, with images of bells that turn into 100’s and back into bells as the note is tilted back and forth;

2. and a bell within the inkwell, found on the front of the note, whose color turns to green from copper as the note is tilted.

3. The new note retains the old bill’s security features that have been found effective against counterfeiting: a portrait watermark of Benjamin Franklin, whose image graces the front, that is visible on both sides;

4. a security thread running vertically through the note which glows pink when exposed to ultraviolet light; and

5. the number 100 on the face of the bill that turns to green from copper when the note is tilted.

Mother-of-all-V Recoveries Continues

The steady economic recovery is continuing according to the Conference Board economic indicators released on Monday.

The US has major long-term economic and social issues to manage. Still, there can be no denying that this Stock Market and Leading Economic Indicators (LEI) has been the greatest V shaped recovery of my lifetime.

The index of leading economic indicators beat even the most optimistic forecasts and rose 1.4% in March. Following upward revisions for Jan and Feb, the surprise surge in March now completes 12 consecutive gains for the index.

The coincident index, which measures the current economic conditions, also rose 0.1% in March. Of the four indicators in the coincident index, the largest positive contribution came from nonfarm payrolls. You'll recall that for March, the Labor Department reported that the U.S. economy netted 162,000 jobs -- the largest seasonally adjusted increase in three years.

Ataman Ozyildirim, an economist with The Conference Board, highlighted the positive jobs metric: "Payroll employment made its first substantial contribution to the coincident economic index, suggesting a recovery that is beginning to gain traction."

Now 12 Months Strong of LEI Increases

While recovery skeptics remain, it will be difficult for the economic naysayers to find any negative news should the labor market continue its positive momentum toward significant net new jobs in 2010.

The index LEI has shot above the levels it saw during the 2007 USA stock market run up to DJIA 14,400 levels. But note how the coincident index indicators look like they've barely begun to rise. I've never seen this great of a divergence, has anyone else? Is this a good or bad sign? Does this foretell a reversion to the mean?

Corporate Short-Term Bonds A Safe Play

If you were smart enough to have invested during the dark days of 2008's fourth quarter and 2009's first quarter congradulations. Now what? Well, one alternative is to just let it ride. The market is always forward looking and all leading economic indicators remain high. If you have a long-term plan then stick to it.

But like all markets nothing ever goes straight up or down so you may want to protect a large percentage of your gains by moving into something more conservative. And if you liquidated your stock investments during those dark days now's probable not the time to jump back in. You'd be better off hoping for another 5-8% pull back. Whatever your situation one conservative alternative to doing nothing or hiding your money under the mattress is to invest in Short-Term (no-load)Bond Funds.

Steven Huber, co-manager of the T. Rowe Price Strategic Income fund, says corporate bonds - domestic and foreign - are a good conservative investment within a improving economy and near-term ultra low interest rate enviorment.

Here's a list of some Short term: Bond Funds with the best performance in their category for the last 3 months.

My favorites for those who want no risk but seek yields above the Mutual Fund Money Market Funds (MMF) less than 1/2% yield is to just move your money to an FDIC insured US bank MMF which currently pay just over 1%. It's a pittance return but that's still a 50% increase over Mutual Fund Money Market Funds which are not FDIC insured. So, it's more yield, less risk.

Individuals with more than $3,000, willing to take a tiny bit more risk, should consider my favorite four no-load, extra conservative Bond Funds, from Vanguard:

#1)Vanguard Short Term Bond Index Fund - Investor Shares Class - VBISX
Annual Management Expense Ratio _____0.19%
Annual Portfolio Turnover _____________101%
Total Portfolio Assets ($B) _____________$10.5
Minimum Investment ____$3,000

#2) Vanguard Intermediate Term Bond Index Fund - Investor Shares Class - VBIIX
Annual Management Expense Ratio _____0.18%
Annual Portfolio Turnover _____________86%
Total Portfolio Assets ($B) _____________$3.2
Minimum Investment ____$3,000

#3) Vanguard Short Term Federal Fund - Investor Shares Class - VSGBX
Annual Management Expense Ratio _____0.19%
Annual Portfolio Turnover _____________89%
Total Portfolio Assets ($B) _____________$8.6
Minimum Investment ____$3,000

#4) Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund - Investor Shares Class - VIPSX
Annual Management Expense Ratio _____0.20%
Annual Portfolio Turnover _____________28%
Total Portfolio Assets ($B) _____________$19.3
Minimum Investment ____$3,000

#5) Vanguard Short Term Investment Grade Fund - Investor Shares Class - VFSTX
Annual Management Expense Ratio _____0.21%
Annual Portfolio Turnover _____________49%
Total Portfolio Assets ($B) _____________$20.4
Minimum Investment ____$3,000

#6) Vanguard GNMA Fund - Investor Shares Class - VFIIX
Annual Management Expense Ratio _____0.21%
Annual Portfolio Turnover _____________63%
Total Portfolio Assets ($B) _____________$32.6
Minimum Investment ____$3,000

#7) Vanguard Intermediate Term Investment Grade Fund - Investor Shares Class - VFICX
Annual Management Expense Ratio _____0.21%
Annual Portfolio Turnover _____________48%
Total Portfolio Assets ($B) _____________$9.6
Minimum Investment ____$3,000

Investment research overwhelmingly shows that lower cost fixed income funds tend to yield higher bond investing returns.
The fixed income asset market is no place for you to try to beat the market and to attempt to get higher returns by picking your own bond. Even professional fixed income asset market money managers do not beat the bond market. The higher the mutual fund company expenses, the lower the net returns to individual investors.

Why Not Long Term Treasuries Bonds Now?
If Treasuries have been such a success story, why not stick with what’s worked? Here’s why: Because they were too successful. When investors rushed into the safe arms of a U.S. government guarantee last in the fourth quarter of 2008, Treasury prices soared and yields evaporated.

Yields have been slowly rising on long-term government bonds. Between the Federal Reserve’s recession-fighting rate cuts and the panicky investors flooding the market, Treasury yields are so low that prices have nowhere to go but down. Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions which is the primary reason I'm suggesting short-term investment grade corporate bonds. “For the most part, today’s Treasury market is a place where the average investor can only lose money,” says 80-year-old Ben Jacoby, co-founder of Brinton Eaton Wealth Advisors and a veteran of the long bear market of the 1970s.

Going forward, the picture looks bleak for Uncle Sam’s bonds. To pay for the gargantuan stimulus package, the government will issue even more of them, flooding the market. “Yields will have to rise for those bonds to find buyers,” says Dan Fuss, vice chairman of fund company Loomis Sayles, and that will depress the value of existing bonds. Now that investors may have regained their appetite for stocks, it’s entirely possible that they’ll dump bonds, further driving up supply. Another threat to bond values is inflation, which, by reducing the future value of bond yields, also puts downward pressure on prices.

You might think that if the stimulus spending proves inflationary, you should take a look at Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS. But those have low yields too, and Fuss isn’t upbeat about their prospects. “It will be a while before there is any inflation to protect yourself from,” he notes. Still, everyone agrees as the economy continues to improve inflation will return. The price of Oil has already doubled from 2008's fourth quarter low.

Investing : Iraq vs. California Bonds

I have never considered the relative merits of an Iraqi bond versus a California state bond, but a reader of my toolbox for finance article, Military Entitlements Are Impoverishing Us, forwarded me an article from the Boston Globe on investing. This short excerpt from the Boston Globe makes an alarming comparison that indirectly makes one of my articles points. The piece is about two intrepid buyers of really scary emerging markets bonds from places like Venezuela, Dubai, Pakistan and Iraq. The comments about California and Iraq are most amazing.

Michael O’Hanlon, who tracks indicators of progress for the Brookings Institution’s Iraq Index, said that “Iraq has continued its remarkable trajectory of improvement.’’

“It is still fairly violent by Mideast standards, but many countries in places like South America have higher overall levels of violence now from crime,’’ he said.

Traditional Wall Street investors have taken note. Iraq is now considered a safer bet than Argentina, Venezuela, Pakistan, and Dubai — and is nearly on par with the State of California, according to Bloomberg statistics on credit default swaps, which are considered a raw indicator of default risk.

“Compared to California, I’d rather bet on Iraq,’’ [Emerging market bond investor Saleh] Daher said. “Iraq is a country where there are still bombs going off and people getting murdered, but they are less indebted than the United States. California is likely to have more demands on its resources, and there is no miracle where California is going to have more revenue coming out of the sky. Iraq has prospects for tremendously higher revenues, if they can manage to get their act halfway together, which they seem to be doing.’’…

America has wasted a fortune to invade and occupy a nation that was no military treat to the US nor did it have WMDs. Now America Taxpayers are forced to spend another fortune to maintain security and rebuild Iraq at no cost to Iraq. We got the world to forgive Iraq debt as we piled up debt. Iran loved the fact taxpayers paid the cost of eliminating their number one enemy, Saddam. Now the Middle East, Oil Sheiks enjoy $85 dollar oil and the protection of the American taxpayer military, thanks to their Uncle Sam.

The cost of Iraq and Afganistan occupation nearing ONE TRILLION DOLLARS.
Now this astronomical number doesn't include the cost of a life time of medical and psychiatric care nor disability payments for wounded soldiers.

It's time the US concentrate more on its Economic Might, if it wishes to keep its Military Might.