Showing posts with label home prices. Show all posts
Showing posts with label home prices. Show all posts

Monday, September 7, 2009

Worst Housing Decline Since Depression

The worst U.S. housing market since the Great Depression appears over after prices rose in 18 of 20 U.S. cities in June, existing home sales hit a two-year high, and new home sales gained for a fourth consecutive month.

Lower home prices and government stimulus efforts have spurred demand and pared the supply of existing homes to the fewest in two years, while sending new-home inventory to a 16-year low.

While the American commercial construction and real-estate market is getting worse, there can be no denying the residential housing market has been improving. Many people along with myself still believe prices in some areas have more to fall. But that doesn't mean new housing sales and starts can't continue to grow. And new construction creates jobs more than falling prices.

Declining new home sales markets tend to bottom in January. And this seemingly endless 5-year continuous decline ended this January 2009 at new historic lows. This bust surpassed every other American real-estate decline since the 1960's. The magnitude of this decline is even more amazing when you consider America has more than double the number of house holds we had back in the 60's.


Sales of new homes rose for the fourth month in a row in July, increasing an estimated 9.6% (highest percentage increase in 4 years) to an annual rate of 433,000, the Commerce Department reported Wednesday. Economists had estimated new home sales would increase to a 390,000 rate, according to the median of 71 projections in a Bloomberg News survey. July’s sales pace was the highest in 10 months and exceeded all estimates. The seasonally adjusted sales rate was the highest since last September. The fourth consecutive increase in sales adds to the growing body of evidence that the residential housing market is finally expanding again after sinking to a record-low sales pace of 329,000 in January (see chart above).

Sales are being boosted by more affordable prices, low mortgage rates and government incentives to buy homes. Still, unemployment, rising foreclosures and falling prices are keeping some buyers on the sidelines.

With historic high unemployment there remains ample reason to doubt whether this increase in sales can be sustained in 2010, particularly given that the first-time buyer tax credit is set to expire Nov. 30th. It's believed to have accounted for around 35% of the sales increase this year. You can bet the real-estate industry has been lobbying for an extention.


This chart (above) plots the unemployment rate (inverted) againest new housing starts. It's no suprise there is a relationship. But note how unemployment usually continues rising even as new home sales begin rising. Just more proof New home sales are a leading economic indicator while unemployment is a lagging indicator.

Improvements in the unemployment rate lagged behind the start of a recovery by an average six months, according to Berson, the former chief economist of Washington-based Fannie Mae.

Existing home sales already have reached that marker, gaining for the last four months. Single-family housing starts improved for the last five months, two months short of the recovery average, and new-home sales jumped 9.6 percent in July, the most in four years, halfway toward the average eight months of consecutive gains before the onset of economic improvement.

The American housing sectors importance has grown

A review of the last 10 USA recessions since World War Two shows 80% (8) of them were preceded by substantial problems in housing and consumer durables. Except for the downturn after the Korean War and the 2000-01 internet and telecom collapse in business equipment and software investment, it has been a consumer cycle not a business cycle. And with 35 years of a declining American manufacturing sector the housing sectors importance to America's GDP and jobs has risen.

Economist Dr. Edward Leamer (UCLA Professor) published a report back in 2007 whose conclusion summation was the report title: Housing Is The Business Cycle

Residential construction and home sales led the way out of the previous seven recessions going back to 1960, according to David Berson, chief economist of PMI Group, a mortgage insurer in Walnut Creek, California. Home resales gained strength an average four months before the end of a recession, single-family housing starts improved for seven months, and new-home sales grew for eight months.


This chart (above) shows how New Home sales grew off the bottom of the last four biggest housing down markets and includes the current market. The above graph compares the current recovery with four previous housing recoveries. The recoveries are labeled with the month that single-family housing starts bottomed. Notice how we've now had four months increase but you can see how weak this looks realitive to the past. And if this chart were adjusted for the current number of households relative to the much lower number of the past the size of this historic bust is gigantic.

The second graph (below) shows the same data, normalized by setting the bottom for single-family housing starts to 100.

This graph shows that housing starts usually double in the two years following the bottom. Starts increased 80 percent over two years in the recovery following the Jan 1991 bottom, and 136 percent in the recovery following the Jan 1970 bottom.

Housing starts usually double in the two years following the bottom.

If starts doubled over the two years following the Jan 2009 bottom, single-family starts would recover to 715 thousand by Jan 2011. And looking at the first graph some people might think single-family starts might recover to a 1.1 million rate within 2 years. Bill McBride at CalculatedRisk.com who created these charts believes that's very unlikely.

Bill McBride does believe the bottom is in for housing but expects the recovery to be sluggish due to an excess in existing housing units, and decline in homeownership rate. His view does appear to represent the consensus view of everyone I've heard speak. I'd add a return to more historical higher down payments and tighter underwritng standards will hold demand down, along with high unemployment and underemployment.


Fresh "Green Shoots" can be found in multiply locations.

Exhibit A: Portland home sales jumped in July, marking the first year-over-year increase in sales for any month since early 2006. A total of 3,375 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow last month in the Portland metro area. That was up 9.3% from June and up 5.8% from a year earlier. The number of homes sold in July was the highest for any month since August 2007, when 4,242 sold.

Exhibit B: Seattle home sales rose above last year's level for the first time in more than three years last month amid relatively robust sales below $300,000. The median sale price fell, ending its three-month streak of month-to-month gains. A total of 4,221 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow last month in the Seattle area. Last month's sales rose 2.5% from the prior month and were 8.8% higher than a year earlier. July's sales total was the highest for any month since October 2007, when 4,434 homes sold. Last month's annual gain for total sales ended 37 consecutive months of year-over-year declines.

Exhibit C: Phoenix-area home sales climbed above a year ago for the seventh consecutive month in July but dipped below June as purchases of foreclosed properties continued to wane. The region’s decreasing reliance on sales of heavily discounted, lender-owned homes helped the median sale price inch higher for the third consecutive month. A total of 10,288 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in the Phoenix metropolitan area in July, down 4.1% from June but up 27.7% from a year ago. Total home sales were the highest for the month of July since 2006.

Exhibit D: Las Vegas home sales rose above a year ago for the 11th consecutive month in July as investors and first-time buyers continued to target lower-cost, post-foreclosure properties. A total of 5,311 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in the Las Vegas metro area last month, down 3.8% from June but up 28.5% from a year ago. It was the highest sales total for any July since 6,530 homes sold in July 2006. July marked the 16th consecutive month in which sales of existing single-family detached houses rose on a year-over-year basis. The 3,925 single-family house resales last month were the highest for any July since 4,555 sold in July 2005. Resale condos have seen an annual sales gain for 13 straight months and in July sales were the highest for that month since 2005.

Get the most current real-estate regional news from DQNews.com

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

California Day Dreaming Homes For $750,000


This "California Dreaming", foreclosed home, was purchased for $750,000 in December 2004 with what appears to have been only $25,000 down. You may find it in San Francisco at 126 Chester Avenue where the bank had to take it back in November of 2008, white picket fence and all. Back on the market and asking $447,000 in 2009. With a sale for $360,000 in March of 1999, a sale at asking would represent average annual appreciation (CAGR) of 2.1% over the past ten years, but a 40% drop in value over the past five.

The accountant in me looks at these two homes and says only a fool would pay $750,000 for these properties. And only another fool would loan $700,000 on a 40 to 60 year old home that would be lucky to sell for $125,000 in the Detroit Michigan area. Why not just tear the property down and build a new home, fools?

I bought a new SAAB Turbo CD sedan in 1992. Fantastick car. I kept my baby for 17 years, putting a new engine in it in 2001. I spend thousands over the years to maintain it in excellent running condition. Yet, at the end of the day it was still 17 years old. No auto dealer was willing to give more than a $1,000 trade in value for a Car who's replacement value would be $41,000 today. So, why is it buyers and bankers think a 60 year old home in a declining area should keep rising in value forever?

By my standards these old homes are still over-valued, given their 50-60 year old economic life. Putting expensive fixtures and remodeling into one of these old timers, doesn't change the 60 year old wiring and structure or location.


This "California Day Dreaming" foreclosed home was Purchased for $720,000 in September 2005, the bidding for 399 Leland Avenue in San Francisco opened at $306,000 and generated one bid. It sold for $306,000.01 which represents a 57% haircut from its previous sale price, but also average annual appreciation of 2.4% since its sale for $240,000 in 1999 for this single-family. Again to complete the 2005 $720,000 purchase it took two fools. A buyer and a banker, both fools, for paying such an outrageous price.Details for both homes and other area "deals".

Financial Charts and Graphs are often cold and lifeless. But a picture, as they say, is worth a thousand words.

Twenty five years ago during the 80's great American real-estate bust I drove down to the San Francisco Bay Area to bid on some Lake Tahoe time share properties. I had skied Lake Tahoe and fell in love with the area. So, after staying at a new resort that had been built on the side of a mountain I attended sales presentations. The offer sounded reasonable but hearing of some owner foreclosed property auctions in the Bay Area I decided to check it out while on vacation. I easily purchased a unit at the Tahoe resort for 60 cents on the dollar. I never thought the price was a steal, I thought it was a reasonable. Still own it, plus a few more. For business I had the good fortune of attending conferences in San Francisco Bay and LA areas during the 80's and 90's. Absolutely loved that area too.

So, I became familiar with California real-estate prices. But it wasn't until 2005 when I watch a news report on the CA real-estate boom, that I realized just how big the tulip blub mania had gotten. If you show me a new suburban CA home for $1.8 million I have no idea if that is or is not reasonable. I'd need an area real-estate advisor to know. And new commercial real-estate is another story. Even after a bust you still have a new building not a 100 year old home restoration money pit. But when I saw 1,100 sq. ft. two bed room, one bath room homes built just after WWII, which sold for maybe $25,000, now being sold for $750,000 in 2005, I knew the buying frenzy had reached the point of madness.

The finance guy inside me could understand the Wall Street financial engineering and the Treasuries low interest rate policy funding the speculation. But Wall Street and Greenspan was not mandating you had to buy a pig for the price of a triple-crown stallion horse price.

The accounting guy in me still cannot figure out why people want to take an old home built in the 1920's to 1940's for $10,000 to $25,000 and refurbish them with fixtures made for a million dollar home. Sure fixer-upper homes requiring limited expendentures make great values. But when you feel the need to put $150,000 into something that looks worth $100,000...stop. It's time to tear down the old and build new!

Why weren't more bankers and appraisers screaming this is economic madness?

Below is a $550,000 4 Bedroom 3.5 Bath 3,780 sq. ft. home in a more reasonable priced mid-western town. Listing

See New Home Sales Hit Historic Bottom In First QTR. 2009.

Below is an old refurbished Detroit Mansion for $149,000
NEW LOWER PRICE. Exquisite Boston Edison home. Beautifully maintained and featuring 3natural fireplaces, gleaming hardwood floors, and very large room sizes. Elegant foyer with graceful stairway leading up featuring stained glass stairwindow. Potential for 5th (12 x 18) bedroom attached to 4th. Completely finished 3rd floor with separate forced air heating and new windows. Newer Boiler. Pre-appl req'd. Alarm. Short Sale.

"California Dreaming" This my friends is the real deal.