Interest Rates Foresee No Inflation

(10-18-09 update)
A run away inflation train is what many believe we'll see resulting from tons of USA money printing and borrowing.

Many of us recall the rising inflation days of the 70's exploding into ultra high interest rates that peaked around 1981. But if history is to repeat itself then we should be seeing rising interest rates in 2009 not declining (or stable) rates. And our governments selling of 30 year bonds at less than 1/2% interest rates to investors (during the fall 2008 financial panic) was the shrewd financial move of this decade. What does that make the buyers of those bonds? Can you say...fools.

The charts below show no rising interest rates (for now).

The times, as Bob Dylan sang,"..they are a changing" and someday we (USA) may have hyperinflation or stagflation again. But for the next year just expect Japanese style stagenation. After all, if the Japanese can be in a 20 year stagnation cycle of low inflation and low interest rates why can't the USA have the same. Japan has even had much lower average unemployment than the USA with low inflation. But wait, I'm forgetting one gagantic detail. Our excessive national debt. True that will come into play but I'm perdicting later not sooner.

The countries with the greatest potential for inflation are India and China. But they can view that as more a sign of their positive economic outlook and growth from much lower GDP levels of 20 years ago.

Why has the USA market continued to climb?

Less market fear and lower interest rates combined with some economic green shoots has resulted in the greatest American market bounce back since the 1930's. And lower corporate borrowing cost and slashed employee staffs mean higher future profits for large corporations even if revenues do not grow.

Forget what you want to believe and examine the data. During the 70's and 80's interest rates rose and fell but as you see in the charts below the trend was rapidly rising. This is the opposite trend of what we've experience over the last 20 years. So, while traditional beliefs may not have changed clearly the data shows something has changed. So what has changed?

What causes inflation?

Milton Friedman noted, “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon....It is a situation in which too few goods are being chased by too much money". The monetary policy is as lose as it gets. Economic's teaches us that inflation has two key drivers. #1. Cost-Push Inflation, workers’ ability to negotiate higher wages for themselves and business ability to raise prices. Rising commodities prices and product shortages can also cause this problem. We have neither. #2. Demand-Pull Inflation, resulting from an increase in aggregate demand, caused by an increase in money supply and increases in government and consumer purchases. We have both with one big exception. Consumer spending is only modestly recovering.

True, government gifts for spending like Cash for Clunkers $4,500 and $8,000 for first time home buyers resulted in a spike in spending. But at this point no bear or bull nor economist believes consumer spending is rapidly rising.

Therefore the U.S. monetary policy will (most likely) maintain the Fed-Funds rate under 1% through 2010. You can thank (or curse, if you have large amounts of savings earning near zero rates) our governments for keeping rates low like they did in 2001-2004. But unlike 2001-2004 we have record breaking amounts of unemployed and under employed people. And the (2001-04) housing building and spending boom is now bust. So, I'd bet we'll not see any meaningful spike inflation until late 2010.

What about our gargantuan national debt?

There’s also the inconvenient truth of U.S. debt, running up such gargantuan fiscal liabilities, both privately (consumers) and publicly. And just like the 70's once again were spending a fortune on war and the military. This time it's in Iraq and Afhganistan. Combine this with our future social security and medicare liabilities. No question we have long-term issues that could result in rapidly rising future inflation. The only hint of big inflation now is oil prices. Oil prices are now inversly correlated to the value of the dollar more than world demand and supply factors. Still one big variable has changed from the 70's that is keeping inflation low.

One big change from the 70's. One word. CHINA.

Yes, our enemy for 35 years has evolved into the worlds factory for cheaply built products (thanks to it's inclusion into the World Trade Organization). China has become our banker and product supplier. We have become their most important export market. We are their consumer market.

Why all the worry over China's willingness to lend us money? Why the worry over China dumping dollars? Why the worry over China wanting to cash in their USA treasury bonds? Folks, forgive my bluntness but these are nonsense worries (if only in my mind). It's like saying we need to worry about drug dealers not wanting to sell drugs for profit and employment to drug users.

I hear a few people saying: what is this Madman-Across-The-Water saying?

Think about this. The USA is China's number one export market. China will gladly work to keep us (and the world) addicted to buying their goods to keep their labor force employed. And do you really believe that China wants to kill the U.S. Goose that lays their golden eggs? No. Just because you're a Communist does not mean you're an Economic Neanderthal Man. There's no better way to beat a Capitalist then at his own game and on his home field!

30-Year Conventional Mortgage Rates, 1971-2009:


30-year Treasury bond yields, 1977-2009:


Baa Corporate 30-year Bond Yields, 1962-2009:


AAA Corporate 30-year Bond Yields, 1962-2009:


Prime rate, 1955-2009:


Dr. Mark J. Perry is a professor of economics and finance in the School of Management at the Flint campus of the University of Michigan. He (and many other economist) have pointed out that historically low 30-year mortgage rates reflected relatively low market expectations of future inflation. Some commenters (and Robert Shiller on CNBC) pointed out that the Fed is buying mortgage securities, which is temporarily keeping 30-mortgage rates low, rather than low inflation expectations keeping rates low.

What we believe and what is, are often two sides of a coin.

But the charts above show that other long-term rates (30-year Treasury bond, 30-year AAA corporates and 30-year Baa corporates) are historically low, as well as the prime rate being historically low, and these low rates wouldn't necessarily have anything to do with Fed purchases.

Question: How could all of these long-term rates be so low if there were inflationary pressures building up in the economy, which would lead to higher expected future inflation, and higher nominal long-term interest rates, and not historically low long-term rates?

We each have different inflation rates.

Now when it comes to inflation, each person or family will have a different index based upon what you must buy and want to buy. If you are an older American family, whose house was paid off years ago and who now needs to spend large sums of money for health care and college education (for your children or grandchildren) then your real inflation rate is sky high.

If you are young with no health care expense and renting or buying a home at today's ultra low mortgage rates along with lots of fantastic electronics goods at excellent low prices your inflation rate has been declining dramatically from 20 years ago. In the 70's I recall getting annual letters from my landlords explaining why due to inflation my rents would be rising by 7% even thought 85% of the landlords ownership cost in the property were fixed. But everyone just came to expect rising rents. Today rents have not only been level but in many cases they had to declined to keep renters. Each person or family's situation will be different.

But while each person's inflation index will be different, in aggregate the USA CPI is still the best gage of our nations inflation rate (consistently applied over time). I would agree with the debate that we need to examine the relevance of the variables making up the index to our lives and required expenditures' vs. desired expenditures'.

The Mutual Fund Money Market Fund Dilemma

$3.5 Trillion dollars earning almost zero.

In my comparison to the 1981 economy I noted how savers were paid to save not spend. The dilemma for today's savers is what to do with over $3.5 trillion dollars earning almost zero sitting inside Money Market Mutual Funds. In 1981 you could have locked in a 5 year CD earning 12%. Today you would be lucky to get 3.4%. This is just another reason contributing to the 55% rise (with only small temporary pull backs) in the American stock market since its march lows. Now that the major 10% pull back you were waiting for never came what do you do? Now you feel it's just too risky moving into the stocks that have risen the most.

What to do now is the dilemma. Here are some possible options cautious conservative investors can consider. These options were researched by Glenn Rogers a longtime contributor for BuildingWealth.ca and Seekingalpha.com.
Dividend ETFs

There are some relatively low-risk ETFs where you could park some money while we see how all this plays out. For example, take a look at these three funds, all of which are designed to track baskets of U.S. companies that offer respectable dividends.

The three are the iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend Index (NYSE: DVY), the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSE: VIG), and the Power Shares High Yield Dividend and Equity Achievers (NYSE: PEY). Although all three of these ETFs have the same general goal, it's somewhat surprising to find that their performance has varied greatly. At the time of writing, DVY was down 12% year-to-date, VIG was flat, and PEY was down almost 20%. So, interestingly, these issues have not participated in the market rally so far, which may make them have much less down side risk if a 10% market correction does come in October.

Take a look at the holdings of these three baskets you'll notice some fairly dramatic differences. PEY is made up of the 50 highest yielding companies with at least 10 years of consecutive dividend increases. DVY is composed of companies that have provided relatively high dividend yields on a consistent basis over time while VIG looks a lot like the Dow Jones 30 Industrials to me.

Currently, PEY has a trailing 12-month yield of 5.3%, based on last Friday's closing price of $7.45. However, I should note that the monthly payments have dropped off significantly this year and I would expect the yield will be lower over the next 12 months. This ETF has the most diverse collection of holdings among the three, split between industrials, materials, utilities, telecommunications, and a few healthcare, media, and consumer goods stocks. About 40% of the fund is in the financial services sector. The portfolio emphasis is weighted heavily towards small to mid-cap companies, which explains why this fund fared worse than the other two in the market meltdown. However, it also appears to have more upside potential if the rally continues. The Management Expense Ratio (MER) is 0.59%.

The iShares ETF (DVY) has 101 positions and is a mix of large, medium, and smaller companies. Some names in the portfolio are immediately recognizable such as Kimberly-Clark, Chevron, and Dow Chemical. Others will only be known to dedicated stock-watchers, Watsco Inc., PPG Industries, and Scana Corp. among them. Distributions are paid quarterly and the last two have been about 39c a share (figures in U.S. currency). The trailing 12-month payout totalled $1.79 which would translate into a yield of 4.4% based on Friday's closing price of $40.78. But based on the payouts for the last two quarters, I suggest it is more realistic to expect distributions in the $1.60 range over the next year for a projected yield of 3.9%. The MER is 0.4%.

The Vanguard ETF (VIG) is the most conservative play. It is designed to track the Dividend Achievers Select Index, which is administered exclusively for Vanguard by Mergent, Inc. There are 186 securities in the portfolio with a focus on large-cap stocks. Top holdings include Wells Fargo, IBM, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Wal-Mart, and Johnson & Johnson. As I said, it looks a lot like the Dow 30 Industrials, only bigger. It pays quarterly distributions which have recently been running at about 23c a unit. The trailing 12-month payout is 99.5c for a yield of 2.26% based on Friday's closing price of $43.99. My yield projection for the next year is around 2%. The MER is a very low 0.24%.

Bank of America preferreds

If you are looking for higher yields and are prepared to take more risk, consider the preferred shares of Bank of America. They were downgraded to junk status last winter amid fears that BoA might not survive, however Moody's announced last month that it is reviewing their B3 rating with a view to a possible upgrade now that the company is profitable again.

The Series J issue, which trades on the NYSE under the symbol BAC.PR.J. This is a fixed-rate, non-cumulative preferred that pays a 7.25% dividend based on its issue price of $25. That works out to $1.81 a year so based on Friday's closing price of $21.50 the yield is 8.4%.

These preferreds traded for as little as $4.02 last February at the height of the credit crunch and the U.S. banking crisis. Obviously, they have recovered strongly since then as confidence in the banking system was restored by the massive U.S. government bail-out. The high yield indicates there is still some concern about BoA's future, but at this stage I think the company is recovering well and that the dividend is safe. There is also some capital gains potential here. The preferreds are not callable until Nov. 1, 2012.

Naturally holding only one bank preferred stock is more risky than a basket of dividend paying stocks so this is for more aggressive investors looking for more yield. However, note that they are very thinly traded so enter a limit order.

PowerShares Financial Preferred Portfolio

If you prefer more diversification, consider the PowerShares Financial Preferred Portfolio (NYSE: PGF) currently trading at $16. It is based on the Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, which tracks the performance of about 30 U.S. listed preferred shares issued by financial institutions. At least 90% of the assets are normally invested in these securities.

As you are aware, the U.S. financial sector has gone through an extremely rough period and it is not clear that the full extent of the damage is known even yet. As a result, preferreds issued by the banks, insurers, etc. have been beaten down in price and are offering unusually high yields. The situation is not dissimilar to the one we saw in Canada late last year, except it is more extreme in the U.S.

This has resulted in preferred share yields that have never been seen before and may never be seen again. Currently, this ETF is paying monthly distributions of 11c to 12c a unit. Projecting this forward for 12 months, using the 11c figure, we could be looking at a cash yield of 8.25% based on last Friday's closing price of $16. But a word of caution: the distributions are not eligible for the Canadian dividend tax credit and will be subject to a 15% withholding tax if paid into a non-registered account in Canada. (The same holds for the BoA preferreds.)

PGF units dropped all the way to $5.16 but have since rallied strongly. However, they are still well below their 2006 issue price of $25 and I believe there is upside potential here in addition to the handsome payout. Top holdings include preferreds from Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Barclays, and JPMorgan Chase. About 69% of the assets are rated BBB or better by Standard & Poor's. The MER is 0.74%. This is my top pick for this month and we are adding it to the IWB Recommended List.

All the above are fairly defensive plays given the uncertain market we are likely to have over the next few weeks. Generally, I think the trend will continue higher after a correction, but it is wise to protect yourself on the downside, play a little defense, and add some more yield your portfolio. So hold your breath for the next few weeks. It's going to be an interesting October.

Here is are the highest paying FDIC insured CDs

7 dividend stocks you can count on

The 80's vs 2009 Economy

Did you think a 6.5% mortgage rate was high? How would you like a 1981 18.5% mortgage rate?

You can bet those 1981 Paul Volcker (Treasury Secretary) induced interest rates prevented the housing bubble created by the 2001-2005 monetary policy.

This chart is for all those not old enough to experience truly high interest rates and those who forgot how we earned 9-12% risk free in our Bank CD's back in 1981. Back then it paid to take no investment risk.

Today there is around $3.5 trillion dollars inside mutual fund MMFs earning just a speck more than zero (1/4%). Today is the inverse of 1981. The savers are subsidizing consumer spending, business borrowing and the big federal government bail-outs for the financial industry.

So, if you happen to be in this boat, go find yourself a good dividend paying mutual fund or portfolio of high quality dividend paying stocks in different industries. Stocks like Lilly (LLY) or Verizon (VZ) which both pay 6% yields and give you the possibility of appreciation. Neither of these two stocks have not participated in the markets 55% because they were considered defensive stocks by money managers.

Here are some recent articles on dividend paying stocks worth reading.

Dividend stocks for low excitement, high returns

The World's Best Dividend Stocks

Seeking Alpha dividend stock articles

disclosure: On 9/23/09 I invested in Lilly and Verizon.